IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-03

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 25 August 2016 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6412D61D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7EsJwTXpyI6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8627A12D1A5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DF082806AF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0F9280693 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (unknown [192.134.7.106]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CF9B3800C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:25:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7239E3FF51; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:25:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:25:45 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160825072545.36iklvmpcfcpqawg@nic.fr>
References: <BC3FCB73-3ECA-4374-8AD5-845A452B6835@icann.org> <20160825043551.GP4670@mournblade.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160825043551.GP4670@mournblade.imrryr.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ke2i4jyTu2B4kEnVP7Q0-qZ9DrE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:26:19 -0000

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:35:52AM +0000,
 Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote 
 a message of 89 lines which said:

> When a nameserver consistently fails to respond:

Add "it may make easier for a third-party to inject bogus
responses". See
<http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/uploads/IMG/pdf/DNS-OARC-2013-Blocking_DNS_Messages_Is_Dangerous.pdf>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email