IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] "Optimization" in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Tue, 06 January 2015 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEA51A1B34 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:43:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTrsNf60qrY2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.nic.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5B81A1AA8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (unknown [177.32.44.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29FFB2080224; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:43:19 -0200 (BRST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_786A4ECA-203B-4D69-9FD0-2C3A6BB8BF25"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
In-Reply-To: <FF9F5E15-3153-495B-9A2C-58B644EDC770@ogud.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:42:24 -0200
Message-Id: <95B74C20-262B-43BA-BF43-1DCFA58E49F4@nic.br>
References: <CAH1iCirCRpJxHWu62nCSTCmSumXfTNHi=-jt5eWXzRgspJjm9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip7iGgM=eiaVcy3fHx+KdOJgd5Rh8zLsnDPMgoEnE-HvA@mail.gmail.com> <0BB798D6-60F4-492D-819A-EF4E0F5848B5@virtualized.org> <20150104193602.GA23109@sources.org> <4FF33728-5940-475A-AA41-A197295388AD@virtualized.org> <5D8FEE1D-1283-4F67-B5B9-E2572C3D2185@vpnc.org> <90A16157-BBEE-46FC-9DD9-F9C04292A5AF@nic.br> <FF9F5E15-3153-495B-9A2C-58B644EDC770@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kkM7vyqPkAmVFjYbZZ3lgxQWSGE
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] "Optimization" in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:43:22 -0000

> Of those the ones using DNSSEC will suffer due to the difficulty of getting DNSKEY and DS records for the “skipped” delegations. 

You can corroborate or negate the mentioned difficulty using foo.eng.br <http://foo.eng.br/> as an example, since it's signed at all levels. 



Rubens

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status