Re: [DNSOP] AS112 bits and pieces

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 14 February 2014 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F94E1A0394 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQ7WdSqRd5TA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BA71A02C0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n7so21317265qcx.30 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=4q6EpEv+N7zgPGURQjZkQulo1a62D2zhWYGgRoOE57Q=; b=JFoWfKH3pDZEOTrNOTPc8qSTQ/XmskOHUfPPzGqdwDeltkjyU8LgJJG4lPbljbiIIP CwHMjhtc/fo+sFwjftA6R4DEAqETMmK4Z8ggfNa98iUC1Ng5lszAjKbNnlL2SByu6vUk awqPsXU8hAX9Rmk783CwHyCcKTjDmYr0azhpA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=4q6EpEv+N7zgPGURQjZkQulo1a62D2zhWYGgRoOE57Q=; b=bO6ZpQiDjKnfOTuHdrcD0xyvNwL87Aee1uLk065ZrA9KpJH9HnEdfMHLB/kNOWOdMv +ME6qbjo8r5qxrRK7+yXEno3/w/SGhRUJMpS0tHhlVwH2AsXc02/IzZivs5JdXLgh/46 +8xrqvCZMGzl0SUS9hxncjGKa1i7KLq/R/d1WEQxPe6z4lqz45B6xTpTIrz1yPCQpi5s eP/hJqx+I6Fh92DaxkbmXsVsQzMiK/stgKfe1aUAimYDO3yWPhHVqgOHxWPSnVut4WRU lWK3r+3R8QYlI/F1AqQnJkDHtN4T1htZRRHSMRsBDqRIo6TQZESsxCLeNvIig/af8qer /6uA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3xniPmcYQNMdth11KpqF1O8CxnaTv9vhzA4Ryaxrb+LWpNvW2HaLoZaheebP+XkAqhIZC
X-Received: by 10.140.89.167 with SMTP id v36mr16361737qgd.27.1392412684318; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [199.212.90.53] (24-52-234-221.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.52.234.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm19059660qai.21.2014.02.14.13.18.03 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_484B37E9-4D43-4607-8628-C13FF1118006"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1402141456450.14957@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:18:14 -0500
Message-Id: <668CAA22-052D-476A-9E49-6FB9514E5756@hopcount.ca>
References: <20140214134610.15238.66099.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F0F8E35F-4ED7-4D8D-8860-BB1D6D97CB85@hopcount.ca> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1402141456450.14957@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kkWqYdyGATM0WnFzjelUWnN_t-E
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AS112 bits and pieces
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:18:08 -0000

On 2014-02-14, at 16:02, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

> Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> Reactions and reviews of the two documents would be most welcome!
> 
> The as112-dname draft still does not mention the glibc DNAME logging bug.

Oops, sorry for missing that, and thanks for the reminder.

In other news, you may have noticed that I just posted a -02, hot on the heels of the -01. I received some useful advice regarding the IANA Considerations section, and felt that it was worth making changes sooner rather than later.

Thanks for the review of -01!


Joe