Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 09 August 2019 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8A2120198 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHk9jNs4wQoc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76AE120196 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id n11so96036948qtl.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ERw4xBX0bX3s6OLDUjWvdBnTPpdKEPPPVC8yp0RpRD8=; b=wfHI2H3sIfsPbKL1ohoBSBqpyryF1DPBEhTwjAtmQAqNvJ1WnGdwUGeY7l318MSdvt YBLydgtCsy31XkCuL0n02IrQmJASBkA7H8Xf2Ek8OcAj9PVou+DHOhFAOjUDIWp8I+mL 5eqqpVURJLhouc0vi+UQTqIM/NtyLXyqyWrNN48DS/ir4OinNP9WFhXtBPTWEWnUkK9y 53PMv3PlptzdVjL9OyXJE7i5LAbJVnf84SUNwn/3qKRGJP1y1qjEZEpv5QhT4S5EMWL3 G9g7SzulAQFwLOO4QnKGKkjQtebnnjaOB2bYzGdXxqXW4MKIWFqwN27wQilEgkKjDu+w 7RTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ERw4xBX0bX3s6OLDUjWvdBnTPpdKEPPPVC8yp0RpRD8=; b=kjxtdx6TqdRhra+Zd1MInsvqneTyaKJnGboWZyawLF1betz9oyGzrO7P5qGekaAVj/ kXZ2GYQk/bbS3fIV2WwnSwCRYdWH2XsP6jjxHLJJGRgsKEMBRspsHM7d41J5dpL59HsH MiuXoC5xx4RbCK/WTrugcvkE4d1GCfw7fI6Qv4ohRafdoGsIIb5eq3dDQlHniQDNRWC1 Tjktw2ls6rmZd0rlQXT3Xs3ZWiAsJ9j6RhTAR+14uuaHAxEGQSgW+KBJ/IoWuJkZ4S6h THCKYctvPeiVhurt708gKSxHifO4PXx40ghf3eT7C30Z2YG/Gb++Jii6pTAR8umxGcbb VkjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJ1Skeyg2XjnZc1qc4Vk8KC0eQT8U/mLSGn9+owB6ijt+FRJ60 HgtFPLlcZ1N4Cx176nREUldt/zsXHZ3Mr8oTtoJDtw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDzuSo6JSDX+fXpjSI5CzBghD1ufZsPnMaCbFtFj3cKj/wuaTASpzyEedvF3WEm5haPxWaYKbEymI+vwWX5+U=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b88e:: with SMTP id y14mr17870812qvf.93.1565362559354; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190809084729.4A3CDB80B92@rfc-editor.org> <BDCD75E6-32A7-4E4A-A00A-1261FC2E9519@sinodun.com> <5cbcd020-2a32-ea61-998e-d098641cbfeb@depht.com>
In-Reply-To: <5cbcd020-2a32-ea61-998e-d098641cbfeb@depht.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:55:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLh-5+zDCdS=+9azPAEQ3ppNmSVMsk95ePOEH+YW==_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
Cc: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ksHMYMbO_Kmf9SAi62srtZecdZM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:56:16 -0000

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:45 AM Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com> wrote:
>
> This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
> datatracker-project@ietf.org asking them to open a bug.
>

... and I jsut saw this mail after sending mail to the secretariat --
this is now well covered :-)
W

> I believe this errata can be closed.
>
> --Andrew
>
> On 8/9/19 11:10, John Dickinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.
> >
> > regards
> > John
> >
> > On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:
> >
> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
> >> "DNS Stateful Operations".
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> You may review the report below and at:
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Type: Editorial
> >> Reported by: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
> >>
> >> Section: GLOBAL
> >>
> >> Original Text
> >> -------------
> >> RFC8490 states that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> >>
> >> Corrected Text
> >> --------------
> >> I believe RFC8490 is not updated by RFC7766.
> >>
> >> Notes
> >> -----
> >> I'm not sure if this actually errata, but it should be fixed regardless. The data tracker page for RFC8490 state that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8490
> >>
> >> Instructions:
> >> -------------
> >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> RFC8490 (draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-20)
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Title               : DNS Stateful Operations
> >> Publication Date    : March 2019
> >> Author(s)           : R. Bellis, S. Cheshire, J. Dickinson, S. Dickinson, T. Lemon, T. Pusateri
> >> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
> >> Area                : Operations and Management
> >> Stream              : IETF
> >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
> > John Dickinson
> >
> > https://sinodun.com
> >
> > Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> > Magdalen Centre
> > Oxford Science Park
> > Robert Robinson Avenue
> > Oxford OX4 4GA
> > U.K.
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf