IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 02 March 2016 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480F41B43BD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41x2xmAijxWW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160081B43B9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 27745 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2016 00:01:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=6c60.56d62d5e.k1603; bh=5G18WZOcCyqtPyOj72i7wxzWpTP5RSWqV3vM3YUIjyM=; b=tZpvtUk/zVO6CH8x1/o9rxAHabFmlSZ+TqXtrGWD/aqHEzXDVAL0Oq31cNSPHpN7oLNADfrYfFWDeuXJI8atE/Y9scNuY3CEZEIgWX88PwVJBEyJsyf8PjkY5W4CZV7NY00KLyLA1TLXC6zHajEPOJbPrlJLjuqDzxGOk1g/25w9Z7atOnmMHF7YiZ5l1snq1ybOv2ekpBtGYKBw2v2AfmqBKTNZrQHrvMauJX9hTsvJXxAUGVQlWfEBRSsF4Fjr
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=6c60.56d62d5e.k1603; bh=5G18WZOcCyqtPyOj72i7wxzWpTP5RSWqV3vM3YUIjyM=; b=oGKfi85GNDvM+YH71T1XkbGD2eJLgHwEsBjFp5IAMUzuFepkEQP6wiK/1+p7Y+kRneZJztyBYCFFBzgJiZYxvNY62L6rUetbmUNCJg4FwEcHAuHQJHV4+OVw+1PIO+238yK70jxVPqAuCd14WIasUYO/3XNIhygi9/S/Xx6rKO2m2mVeb5taJgXXu4fTKZloe37NEZLP1iuwHFSjhfrsfjpjczuVrRFZdF7XFe9Wz0n5vtGleqbUSn7Uf5uFD1mV
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 02 Mar 2016 00:01:34 -0000
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:01:34 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011859390.36649@ary.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160301233735.A4C0E438E1E9@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20160301165633.71260.qmail@ary.lan> <56D5CA62.1030206@bellis.me.uk> <CAMm+LwjJ0xe2wDW98JHJfV5jV3xTeuMNguU=rkqrZMzmei2iHA@mail.gmail.com> <20160301225138.53AFB438DCC1@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011813560.36649@ary.lan> <20160301233735.A4C0E438E1E9@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/l7NWsoKspPzXTc6derh0FEACAkY>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:01:37 -0000

>> I suppose I could say web based configuration crudware a few dozen more
>> times, but I doubt it would sink in any more than it has before.

> Look at https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/summary.html.

I did.  It has nothing to do with configuration software or new RRTYPEs, 
which demonstrates my point.

R's,
John

PS: For a good time see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dnsextlang/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email