Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespace-options
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 04 November 2020 01:11 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922CB3A125B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:11:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Os6sH3P5QqQQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2063A0FAE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C12A23EB4; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:11:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <yblsg9r8jaw.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <731ACFB4-74AF-442C-A22B-D3FA2FF49DA1@depht.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:11:05 -0800
In-Reply-To: <731ACFB4-74AF-442C-A22B-D3FA2FF49DA1@depht.com> (Andrew McConachie's message of "Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:05:45 +0100")
Message-ID: <ybl8sbi6i52.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lBY3P7U9ME7N7qH2EtIUCyLY9GI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespace-options
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:11:08 -0000
"Andrew McConachie" <andrew@depht.com> writes: > I’m having a hard time understanding the two proposed deployments in > this document. It's not as clean as I'd like, certainly. I was pushing up against the draft submission deadlines and didn't get all the wording into place. > In 2.2.1 it states that .internal does not exist in the GID. Yet in > the Summary section immediately after it states that .internal is an > unsigned TLD. Which is it? .internal is an unsigned TLD and is the GID. I don't see where in 2.2.1 it says that though. > In 2.2.2 it states that .zz is an unsigned delegation in the GID’s DNS > root. Yet in the summary section it states that “.zz is a > special-use-like TLD that MUST never be assigned”. Which is it? The later. .zz is not delegated. Again I'm not sure which sentence you're referring to though. [someone did note that one of my section names is incorrect as well and referred to the wrong one] > My understanding of an unsigned TLD is that it is delegated in the > root zone unsigned. And I take it that GID is simply a synonym for > what many call The Public DNS. Yep. It's "Global Internet's DNS (GID)", per the document. There are, unfortunately, more than one naming environments. We've known this for years with even /etc/hosts being different from the DNS, and NIS coming along later, etc. Nowdays, there are so many split-systems with both internal and externally differing naming sets I was trying to use something that included the world "global" to be super-clear this is the "big one". -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespace-op… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… Andrew McConachie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-na… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-na… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… Andrew McConachie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hardaker-dnsop-private-namespac… Andrew McConachie