Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E47C15109F;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
	URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001]
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
	header.d=isc.org header.b="Nogrru+w"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
	header.d=isc.org header.b="N6VBjvV3"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
	by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id J1xRNACgHDvX; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.2.50])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B519C151079;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.2.31])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest
 SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2223AB24D;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 mx.pao1.isc.org 9F2223AB24D
Authentication-Results: mx.pao1.isc.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=149.20.2.31
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1719495414; cv=none;
 b=GXXhsGbfnDVRx2nTAdBOWSdodYzn2eCVqd0PbVoqEA3Vxm18DgvEROtoUrlkG0AUVmCJqzfTO/vBoEDicAhYXPpvFCW0NlrwT1Ug8t3nu7nJyacDzzt3wrvAs2PFSPqkMWVDQUfYUO5VO3hG3vU0/W9BnezmLYNd9lJuZcq3w4w=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1719495414;
	c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=7xHwG2YcFdZ60DpRVXKEBkxsREMVa06v9ximE/A2fCo=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:
	 Message-Id:To;
 b=e0xl7BxC8l3AQxbHcsYDXCDW0R/nX+1B1Fr+bHaBPRbuZVUx3EJtjFTATba+m77F04uGEKaGC3ShRqL7wJa18DyWMMBHbqxJSIVKHI0SENAB/yhXZlM8znwqhFMNISTbjUsMxQqB4nBsiZfrfSM9C0cI9Dzkq751o2K3EEa/eQs=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.pao1.isc.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mx.pao1.isc.org 9F2223AB24D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay;
	t=1719495414; bh=GdHIoKUSXHKmgOaBv62FufD9U6ZbB8hEWnaOwryD6e8=;
	h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To;
	b=Nogrru+wv+gncbQEFo3KNQXZOro4ldA1X9ukhopE9PLR8NAfwi4WSgT+UNrItQmaG
	 3P7gmasXhNLLH9UioefTUJgOctPbOhjFbtuYi5WeKMVDc5c+718GmBBHzwixJTP/IV
	 BQFFFkAMh2flXfTayPNOTC89eRTY7dmFK7RCIvvE=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7E611704B9;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722D911706D3;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org 722D911706D3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org;
	s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1719495414;
	bh=7xHwG2YcFdZ60DpRVXKEBkxsREMVa06v9ximE/A2fCo=;
	h=From:Mime-Version:Date:Message-Id:To;
	b=N6VBjvV3PKPi5FPP6V5aFLEwDd5x79F5Z3+edaGG13/LI4zL0HLF5YWbdQP8x7Cqa
	 bhfCE9oXwdXKiti9JnccmJRQeVsG3M1EQAKAKGx6Ky0gLLzOaYQqJ1oFA+sjcCbx0F
	 9Bazh4gWeCXYkrNx6VbEbbwLknUES6itbsoafAIs=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP
 id b2S5kzPTZNeV; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (n49-187-18-238.bla1.nsw.optusnet.com.au
 [49.187.18.238])
	by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DC0111704B9;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 23:36:51 +1000
Message-Id: <BB068698-270B-431D-9AEF-F5B0497EB975@isc.org>
References: <m1sMomq-0000J8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1sMomq-0000J8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19H384)
Message-ID-Hash: CGWOSDFQCL6EAQ3OUX6AQSGARRA6MBEW
X-Message-ID-Hash: CGWOSDFQCL6EAQ3OUX6AQSGARRA6MBEW
X-MailFrom: marka@isc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: v6ops@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BDNSOP=5D_Re=3A_=5Bv6ops=5D_Re=3A_=5BEXTERNAL=5D_New_Version_Not?=
	=?utf-8?q?ification_for_draft-jens-7050-secure-channel-00=2Etxt?=
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lGET0GpHKN_gxgUy1tOH3DHKIJ0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

You use getaddrinfo instead. That is the IPv6 way to handle address literals=
. That way you get the mappings done for you.=20

--=20
Mark Andrews

> On 27 Jun 2024, at 23:03, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com> wro=
te:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BF
>>=20
>> If there is no IPv4 stack then a CLAT is not needed.  Only address
>> mapping is needed.  socket(PF_INET,) should fail with EAFNOSUPPORT.
>=20
> How would that work with code that uses inet_pton?

