Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt)

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 01 February 2018 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2393012EA76 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_rYHuKTSjr3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45852126C0F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.138] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w11Lbded034811 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:37:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [10.32.60.138]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:37:55 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.10r5443)
Message-ID: <12CE7FE6-1B26-438C-851A-14B74B91D425@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180201212014.GD27125@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180128080134.24987d69@titan.int.futz.org> <CAHw9_iLDid5-3JJ5gffdsR_PMCAEwwxB3i7ORLiBVtKwmt0khQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180129233755.3697ee79@grisu.home.partim.org> <20180130152459.GE18485@mx4.yitter.info> <9787FD03-4E91-46DC-92E0-85513D6A9B40@hopcount.ca> <20180130185128.GI19193@mx4.yitter.info> <CAKr6gn0LSjtJL_zci1i=aUYq6bd7vDos_QfiEiS=W0kygXS_MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJObyd4KPL9BsnARDCf-qaS_eYCMuWnn0SV+10OeYzgoQ@mail.gmail.com> <344C35F8-30C0-4705-8B96-A8E07FDCC34C@vpnc.org> <20180201212014.GD27125@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lICWVU9_8zZVy-NOhl9rDjEPd24>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:38:10 -0000

On 1 Feb 2018, at 13:20, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> It seems plain therefore that a registry of in-band in-label prefixes
> ought to be created, so that instead of heuristics in IDNA2008 we
> could tell people to use a real rule.
>
> Before I go to the bother of writing this up, are there at least five
> people who would review it, noting that it must update RFC 5891 to be
> useful?

<raises hand>

As a note, this is related to but different from 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf>, which has been 
expired for four months but is still a WG document.

--Paul Hoffman