IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations and the safetyMargin

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 20 November 2017 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FF7129BD8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Czb9eJAF6zCS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (unknown [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8B3129BCE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 441E624BEF; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:26:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Cc: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <ybld14kpaz4.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <df6bee9d-c140-995b-e45d-fa12f76103f5@pletterpet.nl> <CA+nkc8A=Z2rB7iByow09zFeL45sf6NZcj36KRqDQZ7Cw1kNtUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANeU+ZC7fVrodoRC60CJ3z9MSsoPxbNRJPPaQFNphPeGzPd=Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:26:40 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CANeU+ZC7fVrodoRC60CJ3z9MSsoPxbNRJPPaQFNphPeGzPd=Qw@mail.gmail.com> (Michael StJohns's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:55:18 +0000")
Message-ID: <yblwp2kgblr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lRjp9GBC-C0bvv-sNi5rijxxr2E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations and the safetyMargin
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:26:42 -0000

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> writes:

> 1 something.

I think that the consensus is clearly something like that.  Are you
(MSJ) interested in supplying a suggested final equation for it?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email