Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 19 March 2018 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CED71241F3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 048MP9Pp-Ufy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE83B12D879 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.9.206] (5-226-86-5.static.ip.netia.com.pl [5.226.86.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF1F97594C; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5AB00268.4040902@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:33:12 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.24 (Windows/20180302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org> <CAKr6gn0RrJEzLCg-nzmwpY7R4XUtRXudQZWdgpz2Vt3X1+BL4Q@mail.gmail.com> <D2E84EBB-9AE5-469B-B8A5-37DBD9CD8D44@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2E84EBB-9AE5-469B-B8A5-37DBD9CD8D44@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lbVdpGOP2X9FwUaY2C0FIQ-FAYA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:33:25 -0000


Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 6:10 PM, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org
> <mailto:ggm@algebras.org>> wrote:
>> "A DNS resolver which looks at the client requesting address, and uses
>
> That's a different thing. There's a distinction between a resolver that
> gives different answers, and a set of authoritative servers that give
> different answers. I believe split horizon is referring to the latter,
> not the former.

i've done both and referred to both as "split-horizon dns".

bind9 views does both.

-- 
P Vixie