IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] zonemd/xhash versus nothing new

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 31 July 2018 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016D130F33 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CpKrAC7SqFq9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A12130E61 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86AAC26BB7; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807271758580.22024@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:03:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807271758580.22024@bofh.nohats.ca> (Paul Wouters's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:17:37 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <yblva8w5l1k.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lf6bZTsyh5zYZSIoKhja76Ttx8M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] zonemd/xhash versus nothing new
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:03:05 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> writes:

> What I see is that:
> 
> We are looking at a way to distribute the root zone
...
> maybe this is also useful for non-root zones, so the method was sort
> of made to apply generically.
...
> I think the use for non-root zones is quite a different use case, so if
> I ignore that, we are looking at specifically the root zone only.

Please don't ignore that.  We really do ourselves a disservice when we
design a solution that only works for singular or minimal instances.
This is beneficial to more than just the root zone.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email