Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 18 February 2014 16:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C0D1A0510 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:57:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WiSBiYbw8Gnu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BD41A0228 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-01-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B51F68A031 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:57:10 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140218165710.GD27482@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca> <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org> <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se> <5300C10A.8010308@dcrocker.net> <5300C52A.9050802@frobbit.se> <5300E26B.4030301@dcrocker.net> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402161123090.27242@bofh.nohats.ca> <951E7F4B-81AC-43BB-B878-4266C5E00373@nominum.com> <20140217164408.GC27215@mx1.yitter.info> <9D53CD2A-B443-468B-9EB6-B934728DAF25@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9D53CD2A-B443-468B-9EB6-B934728DAF25@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lgXviO6UVOzjJvkpx4YSEP4Kc2w
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:19 -0000
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:57:40PM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote: > > Sure. If dnsop wants to do this work, that's fine. No. This was precisely my point. For most of the stuff people want, the work should be in a WG that does not have "DNS" in its name. That's the _key_ point. We protocol weenies need to get out of our comfy chair and go learn why in the world people want to put _anything_ in the DNS. Our failure to do that is how we ended up with the situation we have: we keep stamping our feet and saying that the DNS works _just fine_ with new RRTYPEs, for instance, except that many who want to use them cannot. My view was that if there was something that was DNS-specific that needed attention, people should have a BoF. And look! We have 2 BoFs on specific DNS topics in London. The questions are narrow and focussed, not big floppy "gee, this looks like DNS, so it should be swatted over to the DNS weenies" ones. If the goal is a "Get off my lawn" working group, then big generic questions are in order. But I think we can do better. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Startin… Zi Hu
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] [perpass] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-d… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] [perpass] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-d… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00: Sta… Paul Wouters
- [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation … David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Christian Grothoff
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] [perpass] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-d… Watson Ladd
- Re: [DNSOP] [perpass] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-d… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [perpass] draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-d… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Jay Daley
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… SM
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… SM
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovat… SM