IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Key Management and Provisioningl was Re: .PR ...

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Sat, 12 September 2009 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C973A67EB for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcGWUq-dgVK0 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0513A67C0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (ns.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8C3j8rp045703; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:45:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240802c6d0c883511d@[192.168.1.102]>
In-Reply-To: <200909120217.n8C2HV1b085031@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <20090908150823.GA30391@nic.fr> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0909081148270.9233@newtla.xelerance.com> <a06240800c6cc38daf7de@[10.31.200.192]> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0909081307090.9233@newtla.xelerance.com> <68F05A6E-256D-4C61-B03D-82E9E949349F@virtualized.org> <20090908203201.GA4281@nic.fr> <89290757-1889-4CC1-9879-40115FD826B6@virtualized.org> <26B62956-FE40-4F21-9E75-49BA7C3B8C24@dnss.ec> <200909120217.n8C2HV1b085031@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:45:03 -0400
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 66.92.146.20
Cc: tech@nic.pr, dnsop@ietf.org, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Key Management and Provisioningl was Re: .PR ...
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:44:37 -0000

Ok, I've about had it with the tone of this thread.

At 12:17 +1000 9/12/09, Mark Andrews wrote:

>Actually there is blame all round.

I think this is uncalled for and is detrimental to the list.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

As with IPv6, the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is
that they're not getting traction.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status