IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF meeting prep and what

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 17 June 2021 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471C83A29C2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lg3vq29ddijq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9BA3A29C0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G5WCX23pxzD4s; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:20 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1623955400; bh=HYRhXFBWCBCqjx8a88WYKK+uxVyyn4SpKuTIruoQ3bM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=BTn1+VlG6MsTw2aVp51zQhACckhUeAiu+C/WJerVyVeG6mqRw8uwcH22qHe8QO6IH PPqKrW4SmpYkcd6wnKTwkuO74sCpSE1g8I3BMLyqTu49RziF3G/x5wKWf/lfr/6+Lc qDUFNic6FFM9hXJWFqhGIuBiZE3nMwC8cQtlJQM8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8JfTdZohk81; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F349184F92; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:43:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3F084F91; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:43:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:43:17 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FDBC05E-B2D5-406C-91D7-F506BBBACB21@icann.org>
Message-ID: <4f274956-291c-d0c2-c5af-3dc7b5c97b8@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+ESB-W9DvdRjCrdXgaZUWzX5b5cUvu-Ue3zjRrVsnCB2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iK+uPjgrH5GkxDaXAnLENpQh9u7NNGr4Ox3W2n_qkExcA@mail.gmail.com> <3FDBC05E-B2D5-406C-91D7-F506BBBACB21@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lm1Iyqj6WpemSz5jebIy2FmqUwU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF meeting prep and what
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:43:28 -0000

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> With the criteria that Tim set out yesterday, the WG now has 25 accepted drafts to work on. Even if we move on one draft every month, which is faster than our pace from the past few years, we will still have a dozen drafts a year from now (and more if we make exceptions for new additions).

Are these calendar months, or mythical-wgchair-months ? :)

On a more serious note, I do kind of agree with PaulH, and we have
already in the past tried to clear out this backlog, and we have
truly failed. While stopping or slowing new work is not ideal, it
might be a reasonable motivator for us all the push through some
of the work.

Paul
ps. draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only is a pretty easy one to complete O:)

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email