Re: [DNSOP] Current DNSOP thread and why 1024 bits

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 02 April 2014 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACFD1A0225 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tzx45jp70yZY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA1B1A0220 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s32EK3uA074532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:20:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ED3B19A8-D4AD-46AC-84BD-9FD1C333EAF0@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:20:02 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5FC2FE8D-8CB3-4126-9A65-13E1B3D38845@vpnc.org>
References: <0EA28BE8-E872-46BA-85FD-7333A1E13172@icsi.berkeley.edu> <53345C77.8040603@uni-due.de> <B7893984-2FAD-472D-9A4E-766A5C212132@pch.net> <102C13BE-E45E-437A-A592-FA373FF5C8F0@ogud.com> <474B0834-C16B-4843-AA0A-FC2A2085FEFB@icsi.berkeley.edu> <CAMm+Lwh-G7D5Cjx4NWMOhTjBZd=VVRHiPdK7L1zm-P0QRP8P2Q@mail.gmail.com> <knJn1n01E0xxhYs01nJoHJ> <1904697C-49EF-4F77-A71A-3E0E4FC16575@cox.net> <ED3B19A8-D4AD-46AC-84BD-9FD1C333EAF0@icsi.berkeley.edu>
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ludDFAOmNaDXIat_yAEYh9g6j0I
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Current DNSOP thread and why 1024 bits
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:20:15 -0000

On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:

> The profanity is deliberate.  

And so is the pushback against it. You may believe that the only way to get the operational change you want in the root zone is to be obnoxious and repetitive; others may believe that you are purposely hurting a cause that they too support.

--Paul Hoffman