IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 03 December 2013 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1631AD8F7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:13:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3ynERO1zdTU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F321AD8F4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 147ED2804D5; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8284280524; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:13:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE19B3800C; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:13:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:13:29 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Marco Davids (SIDN)" <marco.davids@sidn.nl>
Message-ID: <20131203171329.GD17211@nic.fr>
References: <20131201164841.GB12135@sources.org> <529C593E.4090702@sidn.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <529C593E.4090702@sidn.nl>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.2
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:13:53 -0000

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:56:14AM +0100,
 Marco Davids (SIDN) <marco.davids@sidn.nl> wrote 
 a message of 122 lines which said:

> Would it be worthwhile to add .bit to the list (Namecoin)?

The way I understand RFC 6761, it does not say we must register
proactively every TLD which is floating around. It just provides an
_opt-in_ way for people who _want_ to register special TLD to do so.

So, if the .bit people want this name registered, fine with me. But
they will have to document the proposal and push it to the IESG like
the .onion or .zkey people did.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email