Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D531292FD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8dhbCN6CzPqh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.7bits.nl (shannon.7bits.nl [89.188.0.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCB112704A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:666:0:ec43:d35c:953f:7ad]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter) by shannon.7bits.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D215C1B96; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:57:18 +0200
Message-ID: <FD1D5AD8-6907-4144-AB31-F1226779CDE3@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170328143352.GA12923@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <148942077219.17007.342057944218385620@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170328143352.GA12923@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lxxkda66SuqWzefHV_As0hgaG6Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 06:57:19 -0000

Hello Stephane,

On 28 Mar 2017, at 16:33, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:59:32AM -0700,
>  internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote
>  a message of 45 lines which said:
>
>>         Title           : DNS Terminology
>>         Authors         : Paul Hoffman
>>                           Andrew Sullivan
>>                           Kazunori Fujiwara
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt
>
> The new definition of QNAME describes as equivalent two conflicting
> definitions, the original one, in RFC 1034, and the one of RFC 2308,
> which seems used only by this RFC. IMHO, we should keep only the RFC
> 1034 definition.
>
> I filed an errata against RFC 2308
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4983>

Notwithstanding your stubborn redefinition in 8020, the text in 2308 is 
correct and this erratum is wrong.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/