IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPI-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 09 February 2022 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC03E3A0D06 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:14:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4h0FfCgyWyib for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EEB3A0D2B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AFF482FCBC; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:14:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <163777315136.16773.10633006296842101587@ietfa.amsl.com> <yblh7c1fpwf.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <914ced6b-52c7-9354-4b91-87f80cd26037@pletterpet.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:14:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <914ced6b-52c7-9354-4b91-87f80cd26037@pletterpet.nl> (Matthijs Mekking's message of "Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:33:09 +0100")
Message-ID: <yblfsor91yw.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lyXBUvRyEsBy-x6F3w0COY8l3YY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPI-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:15:03 -0000

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> writes:

> 3.2.  Recommendation for validating resolvers
> 
> I understand why the new text is here, but I think this now actually
> gives too little advice for operators and vendors.
> 
> I know, this is a vague comment, I need to think about it a bit more.

Whoops, good catch thanks.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status