Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 11 August 2016 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C8C12D808 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dThW6Aguvc9R for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E205512B019 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.150] (50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u7B0eTeN005519 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193] claimed to be [10.32.60.150]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:29 -0700
Message-ID: <ED72EA7E-6771-438E-BDAC-2F299642AC22@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACfw2hhqZZmKt1z3ZT_HCUV6uz18ttKqKfhth+=-8t1cQ6pnBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACfw2hhqZZmKt1z3ZT_HCUV6uz18ttKqKfhth+=-8t1cQ6pnBg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/m511RDh8IMta7aOEXhJbFezGBiY>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:40:33 -0000

On 9 Aug 2016, at 15:11, william manning wrote:

> re the 2 second timeout.
>
> perhaps timeout does not express the intent well.  I think of most of the
> DNS timeout options to be effectively hold-down timers - to be used to
> prevent excessive "chatty" behaviours.

Note that the term "timeout" was from Shane's message, not the draft.

--Paul Hoffman