To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAKr6gn0oiK9WKfN95b=muuxG0+0oKv8KDaq=xpabRf-zgCO+gQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <563AADE3.2070704@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:16:19 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:44.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn0oiK9WKfN95b=muuxG0+0oKv8KDaq=xpabRf-zgCO+gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------060303070602040708000109"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/m67RJ_jpj5nXLPVdyOsYNJjkJ04>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] we already have a new version of this problem
Precedence: list

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060303070602040708000109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I believe the IESG guidance given to us is that no Special Use Domain 
Names will be addressed until the 6761 "scaling issue" has a direction.

On 11/5/15 10:11 AM, George Michaelson wrote:
> So can somebody explain to me what we are meant to do with a possible 
> emerging homenet desire for .home?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/
>
> because I believe this isn't just the tail of odd requests from the 
> tor people for various hash based names.. its another WG inside the 
> IETF process thinking "oh.. .onion worked, so lets go do one"
>
> -G
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


--------------060303070602040708000109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <tt>I believe the IESG guidance given to us is that no Special Use
      Domain Names will be addressed until the 6761 "scaling issue" has
      a direction. </tt><br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/5/15 10:11 AM, George Michaelson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAKr6gn0oiK9WKfN95b=muuxG0+0oKv8KDaq=xpabRf-zgCO+gQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">So can somebody explain to me what we are meant to
        do with a possible emerging homenet desire for .home?
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/</a><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>because I believe this isn't just the tail of odd requests
          from the tor people for various hash based names.. its another
          WG inside the IETF process thinking "oh.. .onion worked, so
          lets go do one"</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>-G</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org">DNSOP@ietf.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------060303070602040708000109--