IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

"A. Schulze" <sca@andreasschulze.de> Fri, 02 February 2018 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sca@andreasschulze.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851F7126579 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:55:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andreasschulze.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJ7E2FdXLxhI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.somaf.de (mail.somaf.de [IPv6:2001:470:77b3:100::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F019312F29A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:55:30 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=andreasschulze.de; s=ybz; t=1517554533; x=1522554533; bh=/fP9OyEFGlV4fjLbzPqA4XcqtB0bt2w9+4Jqu6chAlY=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:from:reply-to:subject:date:to:cc:content-type: message-id; b=WRsUksuohx2OT0YH2NiSjC7XHcdQmFFpfsKvIeghR1obPiILbkVNTzFzXSceWhAX6 BVdLFFZ8wLLqnvYRw62pLxx7DsMgR21nolyLH4xre6oaXYkW0TeG8fSU3qJp/Uc7A5 XBZr4q+CHLIuEPB7RC8gq4Rl437quRZjBiod+/62sfIyCBt1xYFbdx0Qj91Wt84xVL 1KmhwotlNok924L0SoJR+uLz9qi8sr8vN+xp5OGWRyN2TI3W690ra8ebdFav1XygJz TKwprthJ35sGEviQ8q7SY/QgBhyj1z08MhHRZLkpzLfxGC1QMs/3vB02BKKoHpTcBy 9rREZgvkPlDVg==
Message-ID: <20180202075530.Horde.UWaxe9eenZ7PyxWYFHCFGdN@andreasschulze.de>
From: "A. Schulze" <sca@andreasschulze.de>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1801251505070.5022@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHw9_iJ-gwC1ZoWQ3YiJraD3eoUf-9-Ay--rPYzy1zWYUzvYmg@mail.gmail.com> <FDCED4D6-A7CE-465B-8344-CA89753ADF19@vpnc.org> <74C0CA59-6D53-4A60-ACBA-4AF5B51FE3FF@apnic.net> <D5D013D4-1EAD-434B-863A-29CB1BBEF4E4@vpnc.org> <496EFA88-BA70-460B-BFB2-69B2C7BC905D@apnic.net> <4540A279-4A37-4245-AE61-BEE5342E3F72@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4540A279-4A37-4245-AE61-BEE5342E3F72@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; DelSp="Yes"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mEZOs4oPCLX3j-bpjO22uU7Kc20>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:55:41 -0000

Paul Hoffman:

> My preference is #1 because, in general, a label starting with _ has  
> been meant for infrastructure, and that's what these labels are.  
> Others might like #2 so they don't have to add configuration to BIND  
> (and maybe other authoritative servers).

just checked, my NSD and POWERDNS serve A record for _foo.examle.  
without noise...
so: #1

Andreas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email