Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340D129464 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGfgpQj1covJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73A1126D74 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb.local (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v2CMqQu5059483 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:52:27 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209] claimed to be mb.local
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+GUDg2iA+MQ9xjNLDVvRgnd9PD=pLBNNvp0xK3UZVSqTA@mail.gmail.com> <1AD82FB6-735A-4124-A0A3-2158EC567AD6@nohats.ca> <CAHw9_iK+SWiHZwGgHZRO2T1MLVQZS-2BaeZBzyUuZ0iWHX2ZjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <fa0b1bd1-f7b8-c3bc-58a3-397c1b118370@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iK+SWiHZwGgHZRO2T1MLVQZS-2BaeZBzyUuZ0iWHX2ZjA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JVp3ENAfceRUuLSxTB9ephIkfGQKsFUEK"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mJEMB3_cm2PQWe7OoHXPkQbYgGc>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:52:31 -0000

On 3/10/17 5:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Once a document becomes a WG document the authors are required to
> incorporate WG consensus.
> 
> If this does not / is not happening, the chairs have the option /
> responsibility to replace the authors with ones that do...

If there's no consensus for advancing an altered or unaltered document
then that's a problem; but not one that hasn't happened before. Consent
is pert of concensus.

> W
> 
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2017, at 18:54, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We’re going to go ahead and adopt it for DNSOP, with the intention of
>>> resolving the concerns people expressed by keeping the status as
>>> informational (not standards track) and making sure the cautions and
>>> limitations the WG discussed on the use of RPZ are clear in the document.
>>
>> I don't understand how this works.
>>
>> The authors clearly stated the document will describe only what is currently implemented and they were
>> not willing to make changes. How can this ever turn into a real WG document?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 
>