IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Looking for IANA registry for --xn

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 06 October 2016 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE5D1297AF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77UhbjPUyK8K for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2131297AC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u96LDGP8031570; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:13:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <201610062113.u96LDGP8031570@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <20161006202257.qt4jfiwhbe24esze@mycre.ws>
References: <CAMm+LwjcC6pJ+-LzwGyoG=VVzT_QQ9UrvM3LcZM1121XqCccow@mail.gmail.com> <1329930975.314237.1475774676486@mail.yahoo.com> <CAMm+LwhnGFR6hqD2PbXyq4OiyLnfAy1K9TbaesmX3A7XVyCiiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGg9zGNzUkGz2_NgrxJnia7Wax6i_f3B-VNZw+1=KAEnA@mail.gmail.com> <F0F6F02A-F237-4D41-98D5-807B323DD3A3@rfc1035.com> <CAF4+nEERTNc0MuycRZLipahsoAWR7riMQB1BfD8qeu54KF0+0A@mail.gmail.com> <20161006202257.qt4jfiwhbe24esze@mycre.ws>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws> message dated "Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:22:57 -0400."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <31568.1475788396.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:13:16 +0200
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:13:16 +0200 (CEST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mRjd2tqudDzw3giSFqLUcJzKVFU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Looking for IANA registry for --xn
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:13:20 -0000

 Robert Edmonds writes:

 > Donald Eastlake wrote:
 > > Sure, you can consider the root zone to be the registry for TLDs but the
 > > point is the xn-- labels are recommended to be interpreted specially at the
 > > user interface at all levels...
 > 
 > Nor would this say anything about "CCHH" prefixed labels in general.
 > 

RFC 3490 does say something about the ACE prefix.

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email