IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Ask for advice of 3 new RRs for precise traffic scheduling

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 13 December 2017 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F54127B60 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:58:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7RsJ511h2dkG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77161126C26 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4FA0D31CBA; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:58:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26F13190888; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:55:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:55:34 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "zuopeng@cnnic.cn" <zuopeng@cnnic.cn>
Cc: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171213095533.tpd52wo6xy7v6qct@sources.org>
References: <2017121315404971736813@cnnic.cn> <20171213081823.GA8970@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20171213084342.GA30523@server.ds9a.nl> <201712131731058457451@cnnic.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201712131731058457451@cnnic.cn>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.1
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mWXhI5vB2nhpjV_zPGwGBWc43so>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Ask for advice of 3 new RRs for precise traffic scheduling
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:58:11 -0000

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:31:06PM +0800,
 zuopeng@cnnic.cn <zuopeng@cnnic.cn> wrote 
 a message of 130 lines which said:

> (2) RFC2782 requires browser's support;

Client support. This is even worse, there are much more HTTP clients
than browsers.

>     Using this method, a browser has no idea about weighted AX/AAAAXs. 
>     It requires no change of browsers.

But it requires change in all resolvers. One may wonder which will be
the fastest path.

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status