IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Tue, 30 November 2010 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3527B3A6C6D for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:19:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.612
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7L4dj-EL4hHI for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D7DE3A6A09 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 7487 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 12:58:16 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188004.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (219.1.188.4) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 12:58:16 -0000
Message-ID: <4CF4EBDE.8090701@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:19:42 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <4CEC69C5.3040209@dougbarton.us> <7B9EF625-1E25-42BE-9546-61C5B7EFC6DA@hopcount.ca> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43E0037FD1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <20101124142303.GB19441@shinkuro.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011251734170.4075@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20101125175247.GH21047@shinkuro.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011261558520.4075@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <D8E75C03-0322-4594-BB27-D825AB429EA6@hopcount.ca> <C4FB358F-53D1-4A2B-A3A4-1C07222C0B51@dotat.at> <1E1C9726-46B6-4891-A1A4-9D71A90EFE47@hopcount.ca> <20101127185010.GB56062@farside.isc.org> <79DC22E8-18BC-44B1-8874-D094844D9E94@dotat.at>
In-Reply-To: <79DC22E8-18BC-44B1-8874-D094844D9E94@dotat.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:19:28 -0000

Tony Finch wrote:

> The question of which TLDs are allocated and what restrictions
> are necessary for the stability of the DNS is a policy matter
> under ICANN's responsibility.

As the restrictions affect implementations, it is a protocol,
not policy, matter, just as RFC822 defines allowable e-mail
format which imposes a lot more restriction than that allowed
by SMTP of RFC821.

Or, we must modify implementations every time ICANN changes
its policy.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email