Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 17 November 2010 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD133A68F6 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:05:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.277
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.082, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rwlptIe8wxsA for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B68133A68F2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:05:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 75712 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 13:39:55 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188004.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (219.1.188.4) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 13:39:55 -0000
Message-ID: <4CE3D302.7090602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:05:06 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <4CDDD642.8080108@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FB73AEDC-2B5E-48F9-BCA5-2637CAF6B6A4@frobbit.se> <4CDE6D2D.40805@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4819246C-FF1F-456D-9732-51510F0537A1@frobbit.se> <4CE0F829.1010605@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7F03C666-16F8-49E4-BC56-F5DD441DD970@frobbit.se> <4CE1A110.1060403@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20101115213532.GD322@shinkuro.com> <04856F66-598D-43CC-8164-90178A6F2952@virtualized.org> <4CE283DA.5080606@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <20101116145308.GG1389@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101116145308.GG1389@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:05:24 -0000

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> If one thinks that IDNA2008 is
> broken or otherwise wrong, the right thing to do is to go write the
> IDNA2008 Considered Harmful draft,

Maybe, someone, maybe, interested in writing draft on how
zone synchronization by BNAME or whatever is hopeless,
even though it is so obvious for Chinese localization.

Moreover, you should write your own ID on DNSng, which should
solve the seemingly unsolvable problem above.

But, my contribution that Latin/French localization
causes the same problem as Chinese localization does
not require more explanations.

					Masataka Ohta