Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 05 December 2013 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B81AD8C4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:36:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utKNFxtURzIa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7531AD8D5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id DFBB62802DF; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:36:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEA828019C; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:36:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E6C4C007E; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:36:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:36:09 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <20131205083609.GA5215@nic.fr>
References: <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org> <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca> <20131203170825.GA17211@nic.fr> <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org> <20131204094449.GA5492@nic.fr> <9650BF6D-727B-4EF3-B357-7E4E2FDDE0AF@virtualized.org> <2614C613-1399-429D-856B-5E2C18DCA7A6@kumari.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2614C613-1399-429D-856B-5E2C18DCA7A6@kumari.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.2
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:36:46 -0000

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:40:36PM -0500,
 Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote 
 a message of 54 lines which said:

> I really like .alt -- it makes it clear that this is an alternate
> namespace type thing, mirrors the usenet alt convention, etc.  .p2p
> seems less descriptive, and not all alternate things are peer to
> peer.

I agree that .p2p is a bad idea. .not-dns is worse (because it is a
negative definition). For .alt, it is cute but I suspect that
convincing the Tor people to switch to onion.alt, or to convince Apple
to switch Bonjour to local.alt, will be some work...