Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 28 March 2018 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1F8126CBF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9N2gQCFXHI0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB31A12741D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:d4c0:581d:b69c:1cab] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:d4c0:581d:b69c:1cab]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0AD27594C; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5ABBE389.5020008@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:48:41 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.24 (Windows/20180302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
CC: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <20180326154645.GB24771@server.ds9a.nl> <CA3D81B6-164F-4607-A7E6-B999B90C4DA8@gmail.com> <5852643C-B414-4C3E-A1B9-553054D3DD46@isc.org> <CAAiTEH8aA3J1j4iUQDisDHiUJXopykKkssuhOK=v+iVV_XZWyA@mail.gmail.com> <5ABAB891.3010306@redbarn.org> <CAAiTEH94S9VE0_QNEmUvVEkvxtBi2hoWo3DUVENJbEiXM+kkHw@mail.gmail.com> <5ABADEFE.30806@redbarn.org> <CAAiTEH9=rmhmRqCQyEbBFKF3BgKbe8bx+G3eAqhdqKEC55eA4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH9=rmhmRqCQyEbBFKF3BgKbe8bx+G3eAqhdqKEC55eA4A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/n46LsKzjljrrYHEo5AaDDqBsxRw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:48:46 -0000

matt, the rfc document set is innately time-series. this was seen as a 
strength compared to some "document set in the sky" that would be 
updated periodically with lineouts and additions, like for example legal 
codes or the ARIN PPML. i think you're very close to saying we need the 
latter in addition to the former, and if so, then i agree with you, but 
this is an IETF problem not a DNSOP problem. --paul