IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane-00.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 13 December 2021 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402A13A0AFF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:02:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wLFS9aPOaeo9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A6A3A0D7E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 1BDK1Uoq012658 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:01:30 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.19; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:01:29 -0800
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.019; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:01:29 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHX8Fw3IIbAnfGhXkaSNrX37N4Ysg==
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:01:29 +0000
Message-ID: <7633467E-B9BC-4365-93A3-47503E20C571@icann.org>
References: <163908832760.8339.4135304026578566025@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHbrMsCbN8+2UCQLCYKvp5RZ_v+srMha5xU25A9Q9F=ASna9xA@mail.gmail.com> <F9919030-4B37-42DE-BE7B-73BAAFDC5433@dukhovni.org> <CAHbrMsDT5-u6n1tJnSjd9X1vMyyp5HcNrvL4NB3Quzi_p5nWfQ@mail.gmail.com> <YbeZyhZXAuLT250e@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <YbeZyhZXAuLT250e@straasha.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F380A425-7761-45CC-B10D-4FAC80110075"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-12-13_09:2021-12-13, 2021-12-13 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/n4SnJ87mvsiMk3NYNCVnsOaQSto>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:02:18 -0000

On Dec 13, 2021, at 11:06 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>> I'd be happy to add a reference to draft-barnes-dane-uks to the text, but
>> since that draft expired several years ago, I think we would need a new or
>> updated draft first.
> 
> Likely so, or it can be incorporated into a separate update document, if
> that's deemed more efficient.  With DANE working group no longer around,
> would "dnsop" be an appropriate home for such work?

That would likely be much worse than creating a DNAEbis WG and having the couple of DANE-related documents there.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status