IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 17 October 2019 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820612085B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLhdax1evA2v for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CACB120168 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id o18so4189552wrv.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FzR8QYbkBCmDE+QwVow1RuXHRcAWfhM+0dYDvXgEK8I=; b=LBZkDYTBiIwVqF/PEFuDxbAZZMP0a7KvTBaRcinA8edpEcMb/d28MVe8MlLmBbuabV vn1m7avwFtXr1TKdTZez2G1Z9ezT6pvS19j/T+2uAqNnqXebSrmfJcVc5+rhgzJwlLDk ciDXbB5TDm0C6mTrMmP86r60ZMaIcgeuaaC5MDNfRlwNnPrzNaUokWdc9433TjTR/xDg Xa4qLcy4K7S3qkfdWE23JPX2w4hlDKn+IlGAZ4PsKO018bj5677DCNsJIYjeGBiuAsSw k92rDCmX7sYv5KY6Kd1mBGt1slLCTEZB/hcAH4gMxeHeEHQUNR7j+fg2ADbo9tC4LAGE RT3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1m2s9n1kMX4q1YNTaXozC+lcas+EHm7ir4wycE8kNaVBsjKtF 6pmE33I7VbqgL+02KmOPJhdi9C8PulkApmnXPlA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLI5b+2tBKpMwX2U4BAQE3KxHaYAbULwdTWoG3lZLJpsqjFFpi44QWE/KFN+8wvOtxhawP2HPX88EbIXBQT64=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6651:: with SMTP id f17mr5350456wrw.175.1571355994538; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJE_bqcM1PvmwR-icgz4UJuwsV_21FGs615OmExvWmHCVZX4Jw@mail.gmail.com> <F8B56E64-AC0A-441E-A9C9-56E4BF02238F@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <F8B56E64-AC0A-441E-A9C9-56E4BF02238F@isc.org>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:46:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqfBt+tohvCxOwdeK5uta4cicaUzEDASYkpADFgsyobK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dec876059523d393"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/n4Szzgw3HgCcpGu75TWmhh1qtE8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:46:37 -0000

At Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:25:29 +1100,
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> > one obvious interpretation is that REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE are signed 32
> > bit integers.
>
> They are all intervals.  How do you have a negative interval?

I actually didn't expect they can be negative.  My main question is
whether values larger than 2^31-1 should be considered valid.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email