Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-00.txt
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 06 April 2017 22:43 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067141294A2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPCT5oxxI9Ts for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11B19128D19 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-20-198.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.20.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ECD221976; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <149130746853.30870.8028044269482471265@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8BeT=4PKyi-ZH3NXTvZZdDkrSuBqjcAJYCG1aFmv4FPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:34:45 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8BeT=4PKyi-ZH3NXTvZZdDkrSuBqjcAJYCG1aFmv4FPdQ@mail.gmail.com> (Bob Harold's message of "Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:28:06 -0400")
Message-ID: <yblpogpdv22.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/n6Z6j_HEmzhDAlO8P7e4KkZXDEA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:43:44 -0000
Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> writes: > This one still needs to be fixed: Thanks Bob. That was a straight copy; I hope to do a new version immediately and will certainly make that change. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-… Daniel Migault
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-secu… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-… Wes Hardaker