IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Wed, 04 December 2013 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600ED1AE02A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:41:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZyyUoQbcSpg9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB98A1ADBE8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::505b:54c7:e28d:28ce] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc:0:505b:54c7:e28d:28ce]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 193A81FE22; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 04:41:29 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_120CCA15-EC20-48B6-8D02-51D6AF13F86B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 04:41:27 +0100
Message-Id: <5D5777E3-A7E3-4025-9772-3A2D332B694C@frobbit.se>
References: <20131201164841.GB12135@sources.org> <BF87877A-8989-4AA4-9ED1-52C82E1BC538@nominum.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312011206480.12923@bofh.nohats.ca> <20131202151651.GD16808@mx1.yitter.info> <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org> <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca> <20131203170825.GA17211@nic.fr> <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 03:41:34 -0000

On 4 dec 2013, at 01:50, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> Ignoring that, other than aesthetics, what is the downside of <p2p>.alt or <p2p>.not-dns or <p2p>.arpa again?

Not much but it is hard to exclude the aesthetics and issues for deployed software. Same question as for .local, part from of course that <p2p>.arpa would of course first give a referral back IF the DNS is queried for the domain name.

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email