Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 04 March 2014 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32CB1A00F1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:00:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUAJ9qyZ0AdE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DEF1A013E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so4923771wes.15 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 04:59:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IgLdD1/LXhYqQIPAFcypDfc0adNYUCC2vvF7Sfqf3+o=; b=WV2nnm/jKGnvwoBEXbRK6D2X6fYJMcFnFfKRRC1xilH2GOI7bFyof5svU5cb5WLxKZ vgCYcn8Rw2yo/2YcmORjW2doeLOkj5R2kbLCypVkkH30mQqzJUwUxQ+eHGN8zpsT2TVX ZhI8slMKBpsb40ACt+VDoVE7SlaKnqgqp5GwI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=IgLdD1/LXhYqQIPAFcypDfc0adNYUCC2vvF7Sfqf3+o=; b=e9vhhxqlceULfcwGcuXmDc1EZTiGSRpjp5ScSq38jiZrCbqZYZVJdjYivFLz93f3xb e+xgSzpyvJf27SVVjmuymZb3tiz3VjGAr7R590jskjlBQnCDgzXjsnx27gSZtKhrIYbG ZyVyL9+T8TBJKawgwZO7d1CqFbB32spw0mkZcZr/Ds+4mwjXMS/dX8Xn5Ujgbs5dsy8Z lWqeLqBZfOWcUMtexN0is1h4J8/l4tJjOsBNvfb2lkKJ17Na32GDlRzgaghExTIxEg00 VIY5PKRHFteyZslVYSBU7DtKtxQFgxrAYFiFnXofwJ1vFyLWwjTq6DgJ1IsfoqxsRckW NTgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljTFVnft5KHkrldIeYz71StZ8b7wqhTZNCQd55MC5nMcR+ZrRUlyTEtPC8v4Xf0v7fiq5D
X-Received: by 10.194.63.145 with SMTP id g17mr15730792wjs.72.1393937997073; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 04:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:75bb:30a5:4f00:69c4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk9sm51697020wjb.4.2014.03.04.04.59.55 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Mar 2014 04:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ0Ymn0bUi3yZBLLtwVK_WOj_y13jNDiPj86ya5ZvUEng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:59:53 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79C0B6D6-8192-4DAB-B4B7-218E05EEB3BE@hopcount.ca>
References: <20140129055438.2402.qmail@joyce.lan> <97E20887-2B9C-4EAD-826B-043306605F88@fl1ger.de> <54BE75D7-E70B-46AB-93C1-042E655BB5E7@apple.com> <D0AC0015-63C3-4C03-A8D0-888C435D2775@virtualized.org> <20140226100311.E73CA1069B39@rock.dv.isc.org> <8FEAF0FC-2AC3-4F39-9825-7068AAA6E40D@hopcount.ca> <CAHw9_iJa_OhzHVCQ4L0Aj+m=zAp6w=mJpAV-_ueh9iukhb3bnA@mail.gmail.com> <20140303102535.6f276963@quill> <531450A1.8010507@bogus.com> <917146C3-BC38-4D10-AA14-C3B7A02B1193@hopcount.ca> <CAHw9_iJ0Ymn0bUi3yZBLLtwVK_WOj_y13jNDiPj86ya5ZvUEng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nVpqkrBWnWmnhBdg6F7GCweYNNk
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:00:04 -0000

On 3 Mar 2014, at 14:19, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>; wrote:

>   3.  The root zone nameservers should either return NXDOMAIN
>       responses, or the ALT TLD should be delegated to "new style"
>       AS112 nameservers.  (TODO(WK): WK, JA, BD to revive AS112 /
>       AS112-bis).

New-style AS112 proposes redirection to an empty zone rather than delegation.

There's no machinery currently available to deploy a DNAME in the root zone, as far as I know. Since the IANA uses EPP to submit change requests to Verisign for implementation, and since the implementation ("RZM") has not suffered from rapid development in the past, I suspect (pragmatically speaking) this is a non-starter.

Delegation of ALT from the root zone seems likely to be interpreted as a provocative end-run around the new gTLD process and seems likely to raise eyebrows, if not hairs on the backs of necks.

I don't see an obvious path forward here. We are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.


Joe