Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52003129B68 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUevxzNpDszt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14833129B47 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id d9so183789276ioe.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4b//IIhYO0ZUpfrRxds02eDPiradNUqYBXJzHOCroAA=; b=h+gFcFm+vQqPHtcbhdZ4YEceMsbDo6sjfU9O3TZwjwrTsHZ3V75+tR9rGCRGHlqZpW Cmb0XlQmBid/dxKKWPMLYBoHUP84pGfiusqaIh2uX+NhzcNmImiKZzMMSUFw5QfABOM/ TRTGjFNFXm53CyOVYioRjbVxbfeIO25tD4atVouZjzRJD1FKN2L37Avpyt9tlRfRnITV BVqZbSWdsohvYwcMltVfdtJ72aTZQD25ec1qhzd9GtchhAuo+5GI8beDlwokYvGIEYeT R1QIz+Lga798SWKSytBfEsyBH1g6R2aQtGb5DKvMJPSjcQvhLnPJwOe6zVL/KCuqOJjl GeCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4b//IIhYO0ZUpfrRxds02eDPiradNUqYBXJzHOCroAA=; b=tEByLGnAaoGan+UkRTsGDvJWlV+AXV3G4Z9a2mqxdQRFghRrd1D3P+oyPuirsy9gFw G2AphdRsTbh5Y0YeYNUQRVnCaCWMIYn1u8OlP2aMmSc9BarYXXcvlUaKD7U+Oxmavjs3 1w98iOkGuNzY8RHi+HD2CPCF3/HhFy+LadjHpNbOWiX48QT5NL7NTpDQiZ6vYx8zXxBN 04xlKYEX4t3ybIka4fBV3v5QUEk/8aWTKY5jnkFYP64IhJvxoP1VhrNPC26JPOWbqopq ttTI7tUCk8cDSXxbb6AMUHsboxwJvjeNV2qZMvfcrQTfd4pEyrbOpuhcM+SF6x6Rt/LZ fRwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIEEhAwQ88bEqtcYZ6T7DJZrFuvVVQEVmWd+t1OSqScqsaykPsCvPtCs2HC68YN2A==
X-Received: by 10.107.8.38 with SMTP id 38mr1038204ioi.14.1482252293003; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from still.local (184-14-200-84.dr03.chtn.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.14.200.84]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o65sm10547105ioe.15.2016.12.20.08.44.52 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:44:52 -0800 (PST)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d0a9134f-5200-d427-f828-ab59b1013eb9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:44:51 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nhR0YpnVdtQqsFe3C7gzzCSsLYE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:44:55 -0000


On 12/20/16 11:35 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20/12/2016 16:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
>> Counter-question: of what value is documenting this current practice?
>> Anyone who is already using it can find the documentation for it from
>> their software vendor. There is nothing here that really affects the
>> rest of the DNS other than "there will be lies".
> 
> The document primarily covers BIND's behaviour.
> 
> It would be good if other implementations were completely compatible
> with that, and this also forms the baseline for potential future
> enhancements which could be under IETF change control.
> 

Additionally, the authors are looking at addressing addressing several 
additions, issues, etc with the followup  -bis draft which would be more 
likely standards track.  This is following the edns-client-subnet model 
for better or for worse

tim