Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF491B29DF for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:04:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.75 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6W0rkfZxR6db for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03ABF1B29DD for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obctp1 with SMTP id tp1so155550400obc.2 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:04:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=f8/hithPL7ocAiUbT3NpQCW4m2+zAop6QyoH44uWGUY=; b=j6Qr0Lsrgf40h1eyTJCORUF0inHlbxPGsGh+rT+2YZSV2P6gnDmqSIReKNde9JwuR1 PxeqVuj4UIOoEW+HsJMcYliIo59RiXx4PW2CUbsafeDJvqqR+X5WjgsFf6vUTEPFr42G BTKC9JOOocs6jfReO9m6rZwYuoYDyRGdRmQx6AG3ODZ2IFxdAQoBhl1+BP39jfoCracV 6A7dslefA3UXKJ9X7VxIiyuVGGzxQNfnbUuOYFxGKO8NbFdaH5YaA0LRi/HZnGpIq8or 4zHgaapQ8hYiSV3B3/1tgq1jYqQ8LgF3NO0D46pwci4xa7jnX3YdBLsVdue0DH+EHskA iwRA== X-Received: by 10.182.66.116 with SMTP id e20mr6823717obt.68.1445983449345; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:04:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.37.134 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151024194950.GA7008@sources.org> References: <20151019213107.9834.95181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20151024194950.GA7008@sources.org> From: Donald Eastlake Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:03:54 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stephane Bortzmeyer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: "" Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:04:11 -0000 Hi Stephane, Sorry for slow response, I've been traveling on vacation. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:33:49PM -0400, > Donald Eastlake wrote > a message of 59 lines which said: > >> This revision incorporated editorial improvements and improvements in >> explanatory and motivational text based on comments on the WG mailing >> list. > > I've read it and diffed it and I believe it is OK. Section 5.2 is now, > IMO, much clearer and it addresses the problem reported in > , > thanks. Thanks. > Editorial: "correct souce addresses" -> "correct source addresses", > "improves the probablity" -> "improves the probability". Also, "a > client MUST send client COOKIEs" is not a consistent casing of > cookie. It should be Client Cookies, to follow the convention of the > rest of the draft. Same thing for "a server MUST send server COOKIEs". OK. I could produce an updated draft with fixes for those typos to upload during IETF meeting week but I'm not sure if other changes are desired. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com