[DNSOP] DNS RR Type Allocation Request
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 16 June 2020 20:52 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71613A0420; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TszX-k8n3I1L; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4770E3A041D; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i74so20574706oib.0; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FYIzmvtIAayVV0fEsSlJ3v4mLR7dxX9ggkm7auSlStE=; b=T5Vm7e0LPdYgEFGhlbYCs+o2vMWwJnAzuPbl4v0lj4/3jqJQqBATAQyftRWWDa3MDT sHXmOkW45A+z5W1iCx4/pEDvhiwK6eGhEq9NC/Er9e5WVehtYiRVz55JOzp7V7LYv+WF wtkULNao4RA3ubgC/UME+6S3497Z9UTYlmkfTs9TjsTXmS2rXxb3qgWVMC9sYMI5Db2t CT/4XUy14sA0mve+0oE7O9JnWPlxckJ12VXPz2BhWh5tMoCA2czlocFZx8eEeZjRD5yH v5xbnmbkjEDn+sYJcibU7NTXj0e2jZCZIr6k8UvUHUlXUKJ1PI0JK2rBdHt69p340vgG DH3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FYIzmvtIAayVV0fEsSlJ3v4mLR7dxX9ggkm7auSlStE=; b=CNnoY74CO/JwtUGCkxLcmx8dPdXnEVQ4iu0Y+6kWvkErbSfIAL76EOuZxdohJBI1kj TOS9Tz5p7gc9IKrzoyH5dOQ1LS92mspyzv2c+K0h3BkvQVZTzA9vdor7NEp158v4G0cX lOPlefCED3c9aKB7U3htxAwxK1WDSyS/FmP0i3KJLO+c70NI6eI6HDB1zTciqhyJBIMm LS5QFe9DiIdMaTZCRiSDVopIjKcfXRW74oelt3jfUN6YwPTp4NlODBdweqXpu/e2B32A ysFJhabo6MVARguT5cE3l7+ME1uNMTnH2VBROYk4PdoT1G0ZY/WpgrEWlTR1JGLmuUFp hToA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532w42NtHchIdyOXYpzuVuss9Ny5zCqVDar4GQ/fIO6IScoYmKT5 7wAYIsGw8QzFwJn9f6KKGktN3k/gN2+pcIKVrX7kA83VdeY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYt33G1PMIcJlL5/BzDIgQSolwZEa9Jm6fZ/Qkpwdj3EOJ5pi/xAza4YTSzFgmQAMG2ELl1lj54mrs+3AIDs8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ac42:: with SMTP id v63mr5087394oie.6.1592340730398; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:51:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+G6joBnkEspDxVsfQjuDuYvpyHrxoto0uSUO6LMf_5jmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098caee05a839b78f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nsjyuog-zTo8wfU9hRWsyyuRTYE>
Subject: [DNSOP] DNS RR Type Allocation Request
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:52:16 -0000
Erik You and I talked about this in the past, but I can't seem to find the email. I spent some time reading the new version over the weekend (sent in a pull request, open an issue, usual annoying stuff I do) and think we're ready to submit the RR request. Have you filled out the request from 6895 already? am glad to assist and we as chairs can speak up why we want this now and make Warren say the same. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6895#appendix-A My opinion - let's get the code point, spin the draft with the new version, and try to get the WGLC last call going by the beginning of July at the latest. Thoughts? (this goes for everyone not just Erik) thanks tim
- [DNSOP] DNS RR Type Allocation Request Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS RR Type Allocation Request Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] DNS RR Type Allocation Request Vladimír Čunát