IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 28 December 2015 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D15A1A88B3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:00:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.762
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.762 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnnGOMmbdrjY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:00:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9038B1A88B2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:00:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 36328 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2015 05:00:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=8de7.5680c1fd.k1512; bh=8wkuIueK1tvVoEE+vL3KvpN8AVYD9VX6T7RGv1yruio=; b=iQu0MSKw9IJB9wbrcmxuGcV2wcBMjoItB0Shneo5Mcvv3qMavRWRRVetanyxyyqluaqijCWIVnTd9nmTYYCp1dHu9yW+a4HpwLuFF/A1YaUGfD0zyIMrfZva0Soe2h15ATifzZVF//jSeNJZR6UqS93Sdw7HXTOqSOP4vQtVUHxQg2B7B6REQUZE+9dYhPlZGJu3enqLshoaCiN103H2OGoV6pKwLqfLprBwx0B4eek8d2abB8V0ImWkfOfAhkR/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=8de7.5680c1fd.k1512; bh=8wkuIueK1tvVoEE+vL3KvpN8AVYD9VX6T7RGv1yruio=; b=0fhknpzWQbjZpXDjxRELrgnbgN+E2vRQ0lm5W73wh8rMK2qNmaeBvUU8aqWSvESIwlkZm1XVSfizNehg+ne+V6oXtJm7qp935+0lRBowajESkr0bkyzAskoP7O8Y0RI3jTu/EpP+izOwsNkLTeUAzqCuojTS8wtr7SvuCesQNBtqH491z4LN/UNBmbsIn7LthAViV1dnZgOVatBl4deHTA+rTfJRD0GGo+vM6wSilV3zn66j1N9GgWWZJTcLVRWN
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 28 Dec 2015 05:00:45 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 00:00:44 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1512280000310.5165@ary.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
In-Reply-To: <1636872.cZNXjAd52j@linux-85bq.suse>
References: <20151228044020.48378.qmail@ary.lan> <1636872.cZNXjAd52j@linux-85bq.suse>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nue0JgNGqFQDNda5n8ugqSZqnwU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 05:00:47 -0000

> i'm ok with that part, but not this part:
>
>>     This behavior causes a variety of problems, such as invalid negative
>>     answers, that are so severe that it is unreasonable to expect clients
>>     to interoperate with them reliably and so there is no point in trying to
>>     work around them.
>
> "For interoperability reasons, many DNS initiators treat REFUSED as a synonym for SERVFAIL.
> All senders of the REFUSED signal should keep this in mind."

OK with me.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email