Re: [DNSOP] One Chair's comments on draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 03 August 2018 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9FE130F79 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vH1tqwXMwPRH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9DC130F70 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA6E3AB004; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 03:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D17160047; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 03:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D12160051; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 03:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Qef5xGjyYecI; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 03:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.67] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED31A160047; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 03:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1808022332580.23032@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 13:54:27 +1000
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8EA26AF-3F7E-4BC4-8D8B-41DC5A66CD24@isc.org>
References: <CADyWQ+HizOJsE9EZ=VEvrbnnyPwaG_yBRg7fP5VvUNTdnidXZA@mail.gmail.com> <ybl4lgg6ztm.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <m1fkRCk-0000GTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E10B9DE1-091E-45DF-9C23-380455113A21@kahlerlarson.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1808021512160.1415@bofh.nohats.ca> <54333970-0416-43BB-8E10-39A4617811AB@vpnc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1808022247150.6981@bofh.nohats.ca> <293393AD-0DEF-47CA-9321-96A481D5F3D1@vpnc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1808022332580.23032@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nxyQWiqeQbnbMrphuBuTwopIRQU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] One Chair's comments on draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 03:55:03 -0000


> On 3 Aug 2018, at 1:36 pm, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
>> That only works for validating resolvers. ZONEMD also is useful for non-validating resolvers.
> 
>> A non-validating resolver doesn't have a validated cache.
> 
> The internet is no place for spoofable data in any kind of protocol.
> 
> I don't think the IETF should provide DNS-without-DNSSEC solutions,
> just like we don't do SHA1 or MD5 or IKEv1 or TLS 1.0 anymore.
> 
> We should not make things more complicated to allow for dnssecless.
> 
> A non-validating resolver is on its own. Nothing can save it.
> 
> Paul

+1.

We don’t need to split out the hash from the signature.
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org