Re: [DNSOP] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 08 July 2016 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A3C12D56E; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWKMQ5x9Bd8o; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B30712B034; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-20-198.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.20.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F7332AFA3; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
References: <20160703100055.9279.16021.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:09:29 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20160703100055.9279.16021.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> (Alexey Melnikov's message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2016 03:00:55 -0700")
Message-ID: <0lbn27zvjq.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/o6BY6ASZtmCMhBAPJ5f4-cpuDe8>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 21:09:32 -0000

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> writes:

> I think this is a useful document, but it is not entirely clear to me how
> well content of this document will age with time.

That's the problem with any BCP, certainly.  But point taken.  We can
make it historic when the ubiquitous deployment of DNSSEC has been
achieved :-)

> Should spit-view be split-view?

Fixed in the current document.

> On page 14:
>   For a stub resolver, problems with the name server MAY manifest
> themselves as the following types of error conditions:
>
> This is not an implementation choice, so use of MAY is not appropriate.
> Change to "can" or the like.

Good catch.  Fixed.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Parsons