[DNSOP] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

[John Scudder via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document, I found it easy to read and useful. I have only a few
nits:

1. In the Introduction: “This sacrifices the tamper-resistance proof of non-
   existence offered by NSEC3”

That doesn’t parse. Probably what you mean is “This sacrifices the
tamper-resistance of the proof of non-existence offered by NSEC3” (added “of
the”)? Or "... the tamper-resistant proof" would also work.

2. In Sections 2.4 and 3.1, I suggest “re-signing” (signing again) instead of
“resigning” (quitting).

3. Appendix B has “The table (Appendix C)
   below”

The “(Appendix C)” part appears to be a mistake? The table is uncaptioned, I
guess you either should caption it and xref that caption, or just remove the
xref?