Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

[Olafur Gudmundsson <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Evan and Andrew fot translating my thoughts into better prose.
Evan, you captures my meaning.

	Olafur


On 20/02/2010 4:31 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
>> I think Olafur's point is a good one, but I'm unhappy with the prose.
>> Some suggested changes below.
>
> Same here.
>
> Nits:
>
>> There are to mechanisms to provide authenticated proof of
>
> s/to/two/
>
>> Each mechanism includes a list of all the RRTYPEs present at the
>
> s/includes/stores/
>
>>> The clear text version has its one RRtype for negative answer, Clear
>>> text one uses NSEC record and the obfuscated one used NSEC3.
>>
>> I didn't know how to rephrase that, because if I understand it I think
>> what I understand is wrong (but that's obviously not the case, so
>> probably I don't understand it).
>
> I think he meant "each version has its own RRtype".  Suggested change:
>
> "Each mechanism uses a specific RRTYPE to store information about the
> RRTYPEs present at the name: the clear-text mechanism uses NSEC, and
> the obfuscated-data mechanism uses NSEC3."
>
> It may also be worth mentioning that the two mechanisms are usually
> referred to by the names of their corresponding RR types.
>
> --
> Evan Hunt -- [e-mail]
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
>
>
>