IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> Mon, 12 July 2021 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pspacek@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ED93A1FC2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=rHDD+c50; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=O70ZjSAy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znAZHs3_fNYP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7D23A1FBE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D2863AB021; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1626104248; bh=/MCLvquH02Y+OEkGNWkxUAK5lcXM0aCAB1sGADLChNg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rHDD+c50CcdFlUvqib6/EZSBY+GG0EaznuU9AZHAPU2pzJnW+cia9r8DYAr49e1XN YptBUdHyw3iFs2+wfJ60BPZwV9CB0Ux6G1BNL851hXFNDIUTAuJxX+KUWLuCWN9Uv7 WBvH965joJCPuyuu0lvXklkh3WlN3QpnvEaD58HI=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47F1160066; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF4416006F; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 zmx1.isc.org 8BF4416006F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1626104247; bh=/MCLvquH02Y+OEkGNWkxUAK5lcXM0aCAB1sGADLChNg=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=O70ZjSAyBQwzOScyFmPU8q2bRT8M+sUrUbDv2GmO2LmqsGEvZhTfWYALN+tlnibd+ SdEI3L4xhchwoEFFfCoQF69r0EQ+e9dm9/j/t7P7jAjCOgOBQoladb4SCsecg2uy4o 4gM45f7XcHxbqGmXiB6ymrFEQbwlzlObfY3Xwvsk=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 34wmow03BygD; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.116] (ip-86-49-248-122.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.248.122]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2FC160066; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: dnsop@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
References: <CAHw9_iKhvHwUfJMOp-YhJkimmnN0f3DLbh+JWYxhCiZ9CjEEQQ@mail.gmail.com> <B32C60D6-B4C7-4419-A3D7-57DBB9BBEFBA@icann.org>
From: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
Message-ID: <67f0422c-c6b6-a110-5ab7-0393dce4f4ed@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:37:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B32C60D6-B4C7-4419-A3D7-57DBB9BBEFBA@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oPw2ip8SHEXZckjdBS24nNI8Mjw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:37:34 -0000

On 12. 07. 21 17:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> The current text is sufficient to tell resolver developers, and resolver operators, why they should even think about underscore labels when they create a QNAME minimisation strategy. Elevating such a strategy to a SHOULD as a work-around for broken middleboxes that might (hopefully!) be fixed in the future seems like a very wrong direction for the WG.

Oh, thank you for summarizing my thoughts into concise yet easier to 
understand message!

-- 
Petr Špaček

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status