IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Sat, 04 February 2017 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C362129474 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZ6hCDFUor_Y for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB1F129407 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x49so76369060qtc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:55:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=edlHKn7ZH+0JqORnbZd6d40YTvSNCbCSRYCPP8B6GPk=; b=Lp4Y6jb6GSFy5+l2v96VN13mN5IG/xcItY+DgFE2jZS5Eclk8pTiyPlgI33cEF9L1P 4LHphqM2184FQ9XCWfK1h8FuISq40IZXkcyxKQqP6O5Zfk+gvtYMCtcCoWekEMAxCRu1 FHaQtkMdQUcxtwBvIgmXtO/shw7OgqpVWLAWbxSbrAT6YtZGlyp7/m8FHp4I5ropVoF7 4S+hjqmYxj4qeSgJC7XBxpAci4tIDPKSPV9mCunhO2WLSdp0sDWSTP66gpRqwL/xFFdd FLHyEC6j30T1IJyrWppjdkkqOY6bQXmrKMxenkLqwJVzCyYUWRMzmpNDXh++kl3Zspb0 /J6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=edlHKn7ZH+0JqORnbZd6d40YTvSNCbCSRYCPP8B6GPk=; b=LiaQk7Hi73A8vRpkswV24mKlUK2TeIX1qjNMJXIuZ1qMu/NzosN9Kr9Ok+DV2Bn//g cmkz/cuZqnK7YkHqT9Iytkir6pleRhkKluukn5roHhv7eUBsHq2fktI9wVslT08I0qSg Dc29+omKoQPb1pznXhrN/EVuxdYIBia6cDPtG5FQtMyOtNsFSkptMfBtqixYEHIy05Dk qZwM+1Yxfe8VMO/mRM+TNPMndybRImVtemi6NUHlx//C2q+i6OSYb105JKdE7/0hhHn0 BE4ycbfFVspQjIbJu/oVohBVKVOPv5Zq8rN/oKWKljvakyFuG9TloR9j31OwcvyP/kMr AI4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mVXd1HYU0yQ2iA8zVW8U9oFQhADlR/1CV0NdfOBvn28TeXNINaHBvlkU/0JjJbQQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.150 with SMTP id k22mr3569032qtb.19.1486245336558; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:24fd:1553:27e9:219? ([2601:181:c381:c20:24fd:1553:27e9:219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm28557245qtg.22.2017.02.04.13.55.35 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0c9ea76d-a541-943a-d72e-bfe255d57259@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:55:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5E7D84B-AA0C-44E6-9860-4233103659D8@gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+8PA3FQx8FqW-xQ_96it7k-g5UrMB7fxARUi1gwQ++hw@mail.gmail.com> <20170201204455.6nymmjlj5lzq2ect@mycre.ws> <CAHw9_iJ50jWgsAe+hRKUtubfAtpt7+GEeCKEASzypcf86+4nYA@mail.gmail.com> <20170204015158.GB67739@mx2.yitter.info> <5BB1A3F5-5EFB-4164-9720-68E262E58636@fugue.com> <20170204021353.GF67739@mx2.yitter.info> <0c9ea76d-a541-943a-d72e-bfe255d57259@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oSGwzbirFld2cJlzJ4Fd0CU7L0c>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 21:55:39 -0000

> On Feb 4, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/02/2017 02:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> Right, that's always been the problem with using this _for the DNS_.
>> Homenet has no choice in that, because the whole point of the homenet
>> name is precisely to enable in-homenet DNS without reference to the
>> global DNS.  I think you're quite correct that we need to decide
>> whether alt is to be used for those purposes.  I'm not convinced
>> that's so useful.
> 
> If it turns out that we can't get the insecure delegation that we need
> for .homenet, then I'd (personally) be reasonably happy with
> .homenet.alt, except that the current proposals for the use of .alt
> wouldn't seem to permit that.

The other question to keep in mind, perhaps particularly for HOMENET, is how long are you/we willing to wait?

The IETF has no process for requesting a change to the root zone (it’s not one of the protocol parameter registries under the change control of the IETF) and ICANN has no process for evaluating such a request..

Generallly when iCANN is asked to do something for which they have no process, their answer is Yes; No; or “We have to think about that,” and it often takes years, particularly in the last case.

(no hats, just lots of experience.)


Suzanne

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status