Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Sun, 14 June 2020 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1047D3A0D3E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOTr2FNUVV-V for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.nic.br [200.160.4.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8723A0D3B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB811CFFAF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:30:35 -0300 (-03)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.nic.br
Authentication-Results: mail.nic.br (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
Received: from mail.nic.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nic.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcAxvgTV29OE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:30:32 -0300 (-03)
Received: from [192.168.15.10] (unknown [177.215.80.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rubensk@nic.br) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD0901CFF57 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:30:32 -0300 (-03)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.br; s=dkim; t=1592163032; bh=N94q75QH0R+636Gafvlan8uKObO1HLZH0kF4ujPnc3k=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=UK4GDXiAjTPD4ExwYAiz09lbbhD23DQHoAekFDshIh5pT/XL7ZFau0E2KhiSaiw7I MDza0bahQMXwPGr7GFd/JbTRjIXpPTNAwcWR90+lwrdu64sscRVye5SKgsPMsbOT9N NfmoSGBBV3entVDWRZGQ8Lny15wE13IE90JoCJPs=
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9FB58405-BC8C-4AA4-B80F-7F8D94E17D96"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:30:31 -0300
References: <CADyWQ+F=JA6fogcy_JGRJaZv=Hq52ozgmY5gmzfPm=1oHcJXKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+F=JA6fogcy_JGRJaZv=Hq52ozgmY5gmzfPm=1oHcJXKg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <29A6A711-3641-4E9B-BF07-8D9E66056BCB@nic.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mail.nic.br BD0901CFF57
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oZEChVBZZJttIcVOL7XXW2-AsuI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:30:40 -0000

I wonder what would have happened if this RFC was available a time before IDNs were defined, someone decided to use .xn and assume xn was only an internal use thing.

Rubens


> On 12 Jun 2020, at 12:12, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run regular calls for adoptions over the next few months.   We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
> 
> 
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-arends-private-use-tld
> 
> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/>
> 
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
> 
> This call for adoption ends: 26 June 2020
> 
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop