Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Mon, 27 November 2017 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2971293DA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rRPollAHmI_1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7AA1293D8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:39:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=a9NAywjyUf1jEh8UGGathemGj0p2k3ROy9F6/vhZ87I=; b=X8asRvTYZS+4FYHUmyg0NOPHkctVgwBZBDws9XS8XrD8TOnkcPL47U5ggvDV8FnZj60I46iHJ3CPZtXfTmS9PzSFYBD1hFWP3u6yHfi9sil88vGhnFD2bg0LRD9UTeYorPrPfI8LhUkFScFxHNOSz5wBxLQz/lUPqbwzgIXiEOU=;
Received: ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:39:04 -0800
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <CAKXHy=dgQmAgsTaNWpj3dYPN2nv7UnZLbe58A9vmya3JNdmHeQ@mail.gmail.com> <57BD04DF-B473-41B8-9ECD-D197232365FB@fugue.com> <CAL02cgRjSyzXYvSF1v3C1AwRwnTkpzFnGa4FRCBGGm-diT-XNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKXHy=eFjdmtP295MmuTq6TWupCqGR=4aCPgYf6TLeOty-raZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <8e8757c5-f475-ff67-0e1c-e7fcaded3137@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:39:07 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=eFjdmtP295MmuTq6TWupCqGR=4aCPgYf6TLeOty-raZw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1A9081567EB15970D4CE3C5F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/orQc3QSgLQnXWLIKv6gDVaHRaPg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:39:11 -0000
Looks good to me.
On 11/27/2017 03:54 AM, Mike West wrote:
> Post-{IETF,Thanksgiving} ping. Feedback (or further +1's!) would be
> appreciated. :)
>
> -mike
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx
> <mailto:rlb@ipv.sx>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com
> <mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com
> <mailto:mkwst@google.com>> wrote:
>> Skimming through the recording of Monday's meeting
>> <https://play.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/?session=IETF100-DNSOP-20171113-0930> (starting
>> at around 53:56), it sounds to me as though there's at least
>> loose agreement that signing a response for `localhost` is
>> not what we'd like to recommend: all the folks who commented
>> explicitly took that position for similar reasons. The
>> current text
>> in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-01#section-4.2
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-01#section-4.2> reflects
>> this position, and IMO it's what we should run with.
>
> Yes, the current text appears to me to be correct.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Mike West
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Mike West
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Jacob Hoffman-Andrews