Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 02 October 2019 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6372120807 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMYZNa22-P00 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D44D120132 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D83EA2A638D; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 20:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 20:02:45 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191002000245.GZ21772@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <156962713660.24718.71133858140531907@ietfa.amsl.com> <CEC273B9-3EE4-4DEB-BA38-FCF90819C0AF@dukhovni.org> <yblwodp2xkx.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <15B56708-EDDA-4EDF-81AD-EC11BFD60717@dukhovni.org> <yblo8z0hwd9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yblo8z0hwd9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ovBYmbR7cAi7ripwN5U4dgEonCc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 00:02:49 -0000

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:36:02PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:

> > I appears that text discussing the possibility of multiple EDE values
> > present in earlier drafts may have been inadvertently removed in -07.
> > I think such text should be restored, making it clear that the OPT
> > record may contain multiple pertinent EDE values.
> 
> Good catch.  That notion did get removed by accident.
> 
> How does this sound:
> 
>       Senders MAY include more than one EDE option and receivers MUST be
>       able to accept (but not necessarily process or act on) multiple
>       EDE options in a DNS message.

No objections from me.

-- 
	Viktor.