Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499
Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Fri, 24 July 2020 08:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C043A0CC1
for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id WkvXagYo-2Pw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
bits)) (No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FF63A0C97
for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=+VevM8tVSQ8XGOfE6u+f1i0ghsToLzMm4rfTz7DuVRk=; b=Y2e8OP73chJY/a4AX754mssHqf
9ukfB6lUMg/f7/Ykd/fwAsf8uRkJ5RToePXBkXoD6eFUbCO5iahXRCHikGjTWgos3vz4UmjLGTGGM
6KwvmxZO79q7dxPXuOc40fX30G8BHTd8jL0hrXA1pvVrjEouyYUPqt1J0bNDfKa51+z4=;
Received: from [88.212.170.130] (port=60845 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local)
by mail.portfast.net ([188.246.200.9]:465)
with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk)
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
id 1jytQs-0000GV-9S (Exim 4.89) for dnsop@ietf.org
(return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:51:58 +0100
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <86c18e80-88ab-5503-f63c-f788766a2675@ghnou.su>
<20200723172449.GA371024@mycre.ws>
<1C6ACEA9-CCC5-41F5-AEAD-432B48370D12@hopcount.ca>
<CADyWQ+Fisgr3cNoTGiwrAgeEKrFfWEw=jxDCy_vm+Pf7XXE6cA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Autocrypt: addr=ray@bellis.me.uk; keydata=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==
Message-ID: <326eabee-22e0-0890-a460-a941002c16a0@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:51:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Fisgr3cNoTGiwrAgeEKrFfWEw=jxDCy_vm+Pf7XXE6cA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/p4DOe7sY99X9xoRyuHnjB2YzPmE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:52:08 -0000
On 23/07/2020 18:44, Tim Wicinski wrote: > Actually, that does make sense. Though we also have to expect that these > existing terminology will not be replaced in the lexicon overnight. > > The Chairs plan on having a few slides on this whole topic, as we've > been thinking about it for some time. Could I please throw into the mix a requirement that whatever terms we come up with are also usable as verbs. "master" and "slave" are both nouns and verbs. It's very common to say "this zone is slaved from <hostname>" and it's completely gramatically correct. I have been trying to avoid those words in my own language recently, but using "primary" and "secondary" ends up creating some very awkward language constructs because those are only adjectives and nouns and there's no such word as "secondaried". Ray
- [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 libor.peltan
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 tjw ietf
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 StJohns, Michael
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Michael De Roover
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499 Jared Mauch