Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1777130E69 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOBZ_N5TFlHh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x135.google.com (mail-it1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4F3130DEB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x135.google.com with SMTP id j81-v6so2259544ite.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5caZMbhMHN+hNL5UPaxpM9rWDmMENbEnDEOD+dsFFCc=; b=qAAkoGPxp8x+QR5HI4XrI2aCOhZnWNo0JIP9r71he46GfWkgx8vSmHj/FUTr6NVOgQ EPJlaYBG09iyLtXmF0fKcn6McEngF8Zz1+uz+Q8YqCk1OX3AUlIOUbiPYe0As8xnYfax H1VZV4QSts1i9YKvDp/wqGuPzsfEEEdEQNSag7diwMSX6934i9gD7SjnMfR52xU7MTVy 7QTNXyuVcPqYjxLn7fLJzlhSo2riZiG6JHRyGRjKeWaV+1bCxUvurCjacshNsjHlR9aw NJ1+fcnwBkb9ZtEziVPoo81/EiFMq+no4PudTjRNIE5MoOpdDpVs4r/SsNJILHwKR0a5 Czhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5caZMbhMHN+hNL5UPaxpM9rWDmMENbEnDEOD+dsFFCc=; b=CNWFr0F//+5/3EN12RiFREoB6HKyGTWWcqHS35bpDfY5iyAfG5JO9vOfKJ4OfiO3UD LHv7ZP6Dj2Pj8JA7kD8QiS8ABwUHXVQMpc4z1f0bhNjE/J4zpEjnmsMTkkcCsRVozjp8 Ak0ZXszaHCLPU35Lhqb/WYfy9x4z9f+CAesE/SgxpCCz9rrj+5b+AuA05J1bvuR4k8bo E5h4pCbtWb8a3jSIkG0XcptusFsKVtSUO1Bxq9623kiILI7j8lstzZ8uLCnnneqTE7Lc 0pyoxCb5HQTQu/6KPR371QxVgdKGibW/1KCAaJTHBCPL32dBnvnOVHVrZXgdUZMNQqqA 7CXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DbK9AzJ20I2hEhWy+cLZe4xzm8oEyQVdyY9b/xpUu0+kyF37Pk EeFV/EArYZLqCeWHdOlHZvplGulKkqRGK4HPU7VE5w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbUl3Z/ir533SI8ofwBik++EUhB9FJCMIqHB1Xky3vCrbXONrcO286UTqHoK5Do5700LqPcWCQX1maxSlfFGFY=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:554d:: with SMTP id e74-v6mr6501562itb.102.1537541702561; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a02:5001:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org>
References: <20180919201401.8E0C220051382A@ary.qy> <08C8A740-D09B-4577-AF2A-79225EDB526B@dotat.at> <20180920061343.GA754@jurassic> <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:55:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH-x6Fu+BisLqLLGmjMb2JHYdFx4W1BHbzGvQ1goPuXZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Cc: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000024a3a057662d37b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/p5EDwDejGBq5kkYcjMVfa8pb7f8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:55:06 -0000

On 21 September 2018 at 09:12, Dan York <york@isoc.org>; wrote:

>
> I do think this is a path we need to go.  We need *something* like CNAME
> at the apex.  Either CNAME itself or something that works in the same way
> but might have a different name.
>

I would still like to see something SRV-like for HTTP, but I realize that's
going to be a long slog .. getting the HTTP folks on board, and getting it
defined and deployed.  I don't see any value in pursuing re-defining CNAME,
because the install-base prevents that from being useful to anyone until a
significant number of recursive resolvers are updated. So.. I think ANAME
is the short term solution we need.