Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt

Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Wed, 26 September 2018 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4F5130DEC; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HlDrrl7mrZuk; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4789512F1A6; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id x23-v6so15768956qtr.1; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8+XR/iqZdffMkNcRFjerGm/IweGUmuyhUanLxUnPf4c=; b=hIgOSAiaEqf5b0BLOLpKM+uniu3jOY29VGaRDFx7OB5IGd3MJRmZsL3NJkZ3JkUoyC lTs3RYH7p2ZuoZPrOq/7es5Mb71gOXo7875GGOdHaUBaLYTJsRXSdDOa0PxFg5R/olX7 upjE0D080g+YoZlZvqXUI43MGK4+wQDkREEwR5ElyDWicebKf2UV4auuqwtcuaui57f8 N1F1z1A62QgVYbnKXj5qZkqGtwMfVfJQeR/9a6lZDMdnX/MHU8dZqW/S7puegmApruLO x7b7C6YsRkrrpLCvrmvLL3MsPSQ1fSiqYitZ5c+YPsN1RgDSngsJffZEdwjmjB9VfsHn bRqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8+XR/iqZdffMkNcRFjerGm/IweGUmuyhUanLxUnPf4c=; b=RPNN2sywVfjJ4h5scBANkIjfVfjRAj3zzHyuciIQp37z2YCwQE3ASGj5hr98e1DIsx JO7pRr0bN8vNumSNaCyB5I0zcgj60nGk8bpV1/MUX0p/9CfbqQkAkGK7mQTTD7vkVXi+ yAO7pujUtZ23NG5cW5/zpifiC9rlXE5a7s6iq/7Mjgp25wCpdmN4MtJLzc0AyDO3bFEl JJmZ9iEs7CJ7GThX9uG5bJnSkIQ0EjxfNQnOpHPCeS1DNwSH4dIbNBhfKQe1HvlFZYS/ gzc6rWh5jI1lvlsw7pcutuoH4sRFgw5JaCgq4lZGq2yszVKPKh0Kh77mTimrUQMHxwrV tJDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohfGFCkzqhHFdl/36dTKYQnZHTamRRC29o584/3GTZ2b33cfecH /0lvebF+x4d2sLPh/0YQasqUcRrFVb0FnetAtiM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63ntk7sAm8zivJDcHXSFvCZrfb3sYwMha4V4NcNyy8FG8HI6wg4VnHIgyLKjcAOLtKDhT2T/5m8+rVAFaghJIg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:85c:: with SMTP id x28-v6mr3078108qth.90.1537930165449; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153751052820.5339.10049404273601155140.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAObRXLWpXVbPyyxuzJH8osi+R1rdV8N8=Woqvq3UR9nk8kDaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd4jjeZy9Stp-v6O0VOyvEJiE9vW1BLuy-wzqPGvDagoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAObRX+6ktcD8i_aToKbX7UJoSPT0NMPV0xKqT8-k+7_d0R5Nw@mail.gmail.com> <20180925072015.GV11393@Space.Net> <CAAObRXKhS++5_cmvjTx3LY+ti6NbGj1NvtL6XeQGOvYuJKw0uw@mail.gmail.com> <3BDC24C2-6D51-4FF1-8A48-CAD4F8CEBF9C@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BDC24C2-6D51-4FF1-8A48-CAD4F8CEBF9C@employees.org>
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:49:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRXJd3Ym_JezijzFVGGUj6hnkLd78dA-B_oug1gZ_-kbeAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: otroan@employees.org
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, v6ops@ietf.org, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003377ca0576bd4552"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pB00NpI9Qima6OY-Mvhuaskrk74>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:49:30 -0000

>
> But in the general case the network cannot.
> Think host multi-homing.
>

Yes or no.

Generally speaking the races of IPv6 and IPv4 connections on both network
and client are going to be suffered by netowrk dynamics, including
Multi-homing,  route flaps, roaming, or other network falilures. Extremely,
a client can get a better IPv6 connection in one second (when IPv6 win the
race), and lose it in next second. In such case, more sophisticated
measurement should be done(on client or network) , for a longer period, on
statistics of RTT and Failure rate, or combinations of them. But in IMHO,
the assumption of HE is relatively stable network for short exchange
connections. The dynamics exits but relatively rare or no notable impact on
HE. So I see no such discussion in RFC8035.

Davey