Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 07 October 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD32B12952C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QsK_qakWRRi1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1170312951E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z190so34210325qkc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bpEDY9VhXgVnGzgg1E3wxd5XFtlt8hG4ba4S05snOSc=; b=NeSrHFFpA/bAMF+OQLLjgdabZkpa0cRSHTPcGsKlF6KUt4gXE6Gr/FstyJPdupZeLI Mj5uSzATGNogW06NpV784Lds7MGkwAh7ihb+pYEnJtmYLtTrTVWeoDRPS0M2Wy5Wwmpv tvUdzxS+vCBszhSfDqjni5KOsh30nAweouwdgNl92NLvWHzy6ep0d8jd5ItW3rR39LIA 8/qVyl420iMMOJ+lkkRkrFVE4iAlf9pbnGs5wNEz7VslmfNitU4ob3UG83x+Sz8c9QoG mtZ7gbpwth5OA6gKHoBJsy0copY7lCozcQ+qdt7Wm/eaUZ2zDlp5FRoIPq8kaMGS7rT6 gcgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bpEDY9VhXgVnGzgg1E3wxd5XFtlt8hG4ba4S05snOSc=; b=D/H26HQqRPHhcbx8BVjEWAk1EIuIO0XHgxaLBCvfHqV+lXAkdtMxwRcSVOJGKKjD9y fJTx98iYhp/YPCQBCWznw7qgTS/rMamN+Y43DxfzfnTiFp15neXR6FRC/Voight/E1Yw jVATJ6txqTCbpP1UIdFSapujeGTS31JDKoRtnaNn7ygz/m5gYh/v0SDFTTW2bpFTGM0R x9kXQU9rG7gRci+6ZKiBPDkfHyPy3xHhpf7C+Q3LNRyjNb0NiQJHqxaw6bU7cZbU38Y+ bRI/4HMi4k96ANypcyb12N2H4KNueETN1HOhIBFSzmdLwYX081ZdFYTWNq5qTUvqeSZR /72g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmxzgtKWNIj7ibdXKKKFzGsudiFb2YxcKNOZeRC0J3ivFwmL39ZHegFycvtHHOZhr40y+jtb0Y5SboOYKV3
X-Received: by 10.233.237.145 with SMTP id c139mr19555931qkg.29.1475855722195; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.147.196 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3a75080b-b14b-ebad-777f-58014730058a@gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJrgF3w-=0e8XbBLbDNPN9Nyuw15WS7AcZO5LbzBLKR8A@mail.gmail.com> <20161004192237.15135.qmail@ary.lan> <CA+nkc8CNx9-ROWkV8gs5N5+Pjw1NJb8qQ3DPXAxDUC5+mJv-=w@mail.gmail.com> <20161006163735.GA18000@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1610061248310.47126@ary.qy> <20161006195816.GA20784@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <3a75080b-b14b-ebad-777f-58014730058a@gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:54:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+k_-Vz9K6nM7XNrR+hvPbGyB-7KfJsZjqVNLzVjXdmCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pBxyxN_I4nN-nxx-HPxDVaPM2Ek>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:55:25 -0000

Okey dokey, everyone!

I will be attempting to re-add, and better explain the "positive" answers bit.
I really appreciate all of the feedback which we have received - I'm
juggling a few plates at the moment, and so am somewhat distracted,
but I'll try integrate them fully and in order.

This will likely require some assistance / patience from the WG to
make sure that I've worded things cleanly / clearly.

W


On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/16 3:58 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:47:28PM -0400,
>>  John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote
>>  a message of 34 lines which said:
>>
>>> It still seems to me that the time to add the wildcards back in
>>> would be less than the time to do two separate documents.  Unless
>>> there's some reason that this needs to be published in a hurry,
>>
>>
>> Not for me, I'm fine with a delay (there have been many important
>> changes between -02 and -03, during the WGLC, so, some time to digest
>> and study them may be worth it).
>>
>
> I agree. There is no need to hurry this along. I'd rather get this right.
>
> tim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf